Sunday, April 10, 2016

Dum Laga Ke Haisha—Of The Force Of Gravity

There is a scene in Sharat Katariya's award-winning Dum Laga Ke Haisha that I have been trying to decipher ever since I have watched it. At one point in the film, Prem (Ayushmann Khurrana) is talking with his shakha teacher, and says, "Kal raat ko apni na sun saka. Yeh grahasth jeevan ka gurutvakarshan daldal me mujhe kheench ke rahega." This is the scene sequence after the night where Prem is not able to control himself, and tells his teacher that he consummated his marriage with Sandhya (Bhumi Pednekar). Gurutvakarshan—गुरुत्वाकर्षण—is the word that he uses to describe his attraction. Actually, the word is used to describe gravity in Hindi. Going back to the grammar classes, there was something called sandhi vichched where a word is broken into its component words. Using the same concept on gurutvakarshan, we can see that the word is derived from two words—gurutva and aakarshan. Gurutva is the abstract noun derived from the adjective guru, that means something that is big, large, or massive, while aakarshan means attraction. Therefore, we learn that gurutvakarshan is a force of attraction by virtue of being massive (or having mass), that is the force of gravity. In the next scene, Prem and his teacher keep discussing the same issue. Prem says, "Koi ilaaj nahi hai, shakha babu, meri kuntha ka." His teacher replies, "Yeh gurutvakarshan na hai, aakarshan hai grahasth jeevan ka." In the sense, Prem says that a gravitational pull is sucking him towards Sandhya, and his teacher says, it is not gravity, but the pleasure of sexual gratification to which he is attracted. Immediately after this discourse, we see Sandhya walking to an empty classroom, and practicing to take a lecture. Interestingly, the topic that she chooses to describe is nothing but again the law of gravity. She says, "Prithvi ki har vastu, har dusri vastu ki aur aakarshit hoti hai. Gurutvakarshan ka pehla niyam, lekin kyun vo ek dusre ki aur aage nahi badte, kyun thame rehte hai apni hi jagah, kyunki dono ek dusre ko apni aur kheenchne ki koshish me vahi ke vahi khade reh jate hai." All objects on earth are attracted to one other due to the law of gravity. But why do objects not move towards each other, and stay at the same place. Because in trying to attract one other, they remain at the same place.

Based on the above, a scientific element that can be read on the story of the film. As we know, gurutvakarshan or the force of gravity is directly proportional to the mass of the objects, and inversely proportional to the distance between them. In this context, Sandhya is the one with the more mass, in fact, the film makes it a point to show her overweight, and call hers fat at many times in the film. More mass also refers to Sandhya's much stronger intellectual capability than that of Prem. This can be used to imply that given her more mass, her force of attraction towards Prem is much stronger. Prem, due to his low mass and low stature, is the one that does not increase the force between the two. In a sense, we can also compare gravity to love. The similarities between gravity and love are quite interesting. Both gravity and love are non-contact forces, meaning that they do not require objects to be in contact with each other. Both gravity and love are attractive forces. Gravitational force increases by reducing the physical distance between the objects, while love increases by reducing the emotional distance between the lovers. Sandhya is trying to bring Prem closer to her, and reduce the distance (both physical and emotional, in this case). It is also worth noting that Prem means love. She is trying to attract Prem's prem towards her. Sandhya also sings Moh Moh Ke Dhaage. Moh—another word for an invisible force—that attracts one person to other.

The difference between the two forces is that gravity can be measured, while love cannot be measured. Gravity is a very weak force, while love, as Gandhi said, "Love is the strongest force the world possesses and yet it is the humblest imaginable can make."

Here is the slightly confusing part. Sandhya, then, talks about gurutvakarshan ka pehla niyam. There is no first law of gravitation in science, there is one universal law of gravitation, but there are three laws of motion. Laws of motion were given by Newton, just as the law of gravitation. In this context, perhaps, she meant the first law of motion. First law of motion says that an object at rest will stay at rest and an object in motion will stay in motion with a constant speed and direction unless acted on by an external force. Although gravitational force attracts objects towards each other, objects don't move because gravity is a very weak force that is hardly perceptible, and also, the motion produced by gravity is canceled by other forces on the body, such as friction, producing no net movement in the body. But the first law of motion describes inertia. The tendency for an object to resist change in its motion is called inertia. Here, we understand Prem's inertia towards, he is resisting to move towards Sandhya, and he will move towards her if there is an external force acting on him. He has to overcome his lack of his self-confidence that is forcing him to not move towards her. 
It is again some sort of cosmic coincidence that the film's title is also based on dum that again means force. Dum Laga Ke Haisha—give in all your energy. The film's theme is based on a race where a husband has to literally carry the wife on his back. This race of obstacles is an allegory for the race of marriage and its similar obstacles. The dum that will drive this to completion is the dum of love, perched on his back, guiding him, and motivating him.

Dialogue of the Day:
"Ye moh moh ke dhaage,
Teri ungliyon se ja uljhe,
Koi toh toh na laage,
Kis tarah girah ye suljhe,
Hai rom rom iktaara,
Hai rom rom iktaara,
Jo baadalon mein se guzre."
—Dum Laga Ke Haisha

Saturday, April 2, 2016

Wazir—Of Queen, and Kismat

Bejoy Nambiar's Wazir is quite an interesting film. Initially titled as The Fifth Move, the film was supposed to be a Hollywood project, starring Dustin Hoffman. However, due to the death of the producer, the project never saw light of the day. When Bejoy met Vidhu Vinod Chopra, he chose the script, and Wazir was finally made, but this time in Hindi. 

Wazir is the story of Anti-Terrorist Squad (ATS) officer, Daanish Ali (Farhan Akhtar). In a freak encounter, his daughter gets killed, and he blames himself for it. He is on the verge of killing himself, but he meets a wheelchair-bound chess grand-master, Pandit Omkar Nath Dhar (Amitabh Bachchan), who has lost his own daughter, in what seem to be questionable circumstances. Both men, bound together by loss and grief, develop an unlikely friendship. However, there lurks a mysterious enemy who is threatening to harm them, and they both need each other's help to fight this demon.

I am familiar with chess, and used to play it as a kid. When I first saw the trailer of Wazir, I was a bit surprised to see that the title of the film is wazir, but the poster of the film, has a queen in it. I thought that, perhaps, this is some clue to the mystery in the film, as the characters of the film could be like the different pieces of chess. When I used to play chess, the bishop was called as the wazir. In fact, almost all reviews of the film have called wazir to be a bishop (link and link). I think this is part of some misunderstanding by everyone. A wazir is not a bishop. In Shatranj, the queen is called wazir. Even in Hindi, it is called wazir, while the bishop is called uth. The queen has different names in various languages—Arabic (wäziir, firzān), Russian (ferz'), Farsi (vazir, farzin), Uzbek (farzin), Hindi (farzī, wazīr) and Turkish (vezir). It is a European invention to call wazir as the queen, while all other languages have the same etymological root wazir that is gender-neutral, and means a minister. After watching the film, it becomes clear as to why there was a queen in the poster of the film, that is because in the film, wazir means the queen. In fact, at one point, during the scene with wazir (Neil Nitin Mukesh), the subtitle called it the queen. In the final scene, Omkar Nath gives a pen drive to Pammi and asks her to give the wazir to Daanish when he comes looking for it. The pen drive was in the form of wazir, and it is again the queen piece. 
It is in the final scenes of the film, the above meaning becomes even more clear. In the recording, Omkar Nath called himself as the pawn, a weak man, who can only take one step at a time. But slowly and slowly, he played his moves, and eventually reached the final square on the other end to become a wazir. In chess, a pawn can reach the other side and is, then, promoted. When a pawn reaches the position of the opposite side's queen, the player gets an opportunity to get a queen piece, while the pawn is removed. It is in this context that Omkar Nath became the all powerful wazir (queen) from a pawn. He sacrificed himself to play an elaborate game in which he used the powers of queen to checkmate his opponent. A wazir (queen/minister) is indeed the most powerful piece in chess, even stronger than the king, and the number of ways it can move is much higher than any other chess piece. In this game that he played, Daanish was the rook, the elephant. He used Daanish's anger and power to target Yazaad Qureshi. It was also worth noting that Daanish always attacked his opponents from the front, as the rook that can go only straight. Perhaps, people already knew that wazir is called a queen, but I thought a wazir is a bishop, and it is this confusion that needs to be removed. I should find as to when and why the wazir became a bishop.

We see that Omkar Nath keeps listening to Aao Huzoor Tumko that was his wife's favorite song. The song Aao Huzoor Tumko is from Manmohan Desai's Kismat (1968). I watched that film if there is any connection to that film. Kismat is also a thriller in which the police is trying to find a group of criminals involved in sabotage. The film stars Biswajeet as Vicky, and Babita as Roma. In the final scenes of the film, the mastermind is found to be none other than Roma's own father. His face mask literally breaks to reveal his face, while in Wazir, the twist involves breaking of the mask of another father when his reality is revealed to everyone. There are some laugh-out-sequences in Kismat that show the ultimate coolness of the movies of the sixties; from magical cars, to flying balloons, to revolving beds, to a band called The Monkees, it has everything. 
My favorite part in Wazir was when Daanish was about to kill himself in front of the grave of his daughter, a light is thrown on him. And, he stops. It is as if this was a message to him to see the light. Later, Daanish visits Pandit ji, whose house has a bell that is seen in the temples. Daanish has a Sikh friend Saartaaj, whose house is lined with the pictures of the Golden Temple. Daanish has a friend in SP, that is all we know about him but is played by John Abraham, a Christian. Perhaps that is the larger point that these extraneous labels don't mean much but what matters is the human bond, joined by the shared feelings of love, happiness, and loss. Like the very unlikely friendship of Pandit Ji and Daanish, sharing the same feelings of loss of a child, ans helping each other in every way possible. Yeh ladaai aapki thi. Ab hamaari hai.

Dialogue of the Day:
"Is game me haarne vale ki jeet hoti hai."
—Pandit Ji, Wazir

Friday, March 25, 2016

Kapoor & Sons (Since 1921)—Of Family

After giving us the wonderful Ek Main Aur Ekk Tu, Shakun Batra comes with his second offing, Kapoor & Sons (Since 1921), which is even more delightful than his first film. Set in the quiet Coonoor, the story is about the Kapoors. Ex-army man Dadu (Rishi Kapoor) lives with his son Harsh (Rajat Kapoor) and daughter-in-law Sunita (Ratna Pathak Shah). The couple has two sons. Rahul (Fawad Khan), the elder child, is a successful writer based in London. Arjun (Sidharth Malhotra), the younger one, is a struggling writer who works as a bartender in New Jersey. Dadu suffers a heart attack, and the two brothers visit the family. However, the family is struggling through not only a financial crisis but also a relationship crisis among themselves due to unresolved differences and deep secrets that threaten to rock the very foundation of their family. In an interview, Shakun, who calls himself a 'Woody, Wes and Wilder Fan' in his Twitter bio, says he loves Hannah and Her Sisters and reunion films, which are loaded with secrets from the past, and what happens to these unresolved issues when they resurface. He takes inspiration from his favorite films and gives us an incredibly heartfelt and deeply poignant tale of family and human relationships. 

Shakun further adds, "But what if I wanted to go big in depth, character and psyche? I wanted to go where the story was more important than the gloss, glamour, and scale. I was not a hundred percent satisfied with Ek Main Aur Ekk Tu. I was sincere, but the film lacked maturity."  I was a bit surprised by the statement because I felt his first film was a much more mature film. In another interview with The Boss Dialogues, Ayan Mukerji said that he liked his second movie Yeh Jawaani Hai Deewani, more than Wake Up Sid. It is interesting to see the self-reflection by directors on their films, contrary to expectations and opinions. Nevertheless, without digressing, Kapoor Sons definitely have the same standard shades as Ek Main Aur Ekk Tu. In fact, the lead character is Rahul, and even the family is named Kapoor in both films. Both films deal with children having issues with the expectations of parents. The 'perfectly average' Rahul in Ek Main Aur Ekk Tu, who felt like a loser when on coming second in a competition, his parents admonished him that he did not win a silver medal, but instead he lost a gold medal, finds resonance in Arjun in Kapoor Sons, who felt like a runner-up, and second-best all his life. Ratna Pathak Shah plays the mother in both films. The cheerful Riana in Ek Main Aur Ekk Tu, affectionately called Ri, carries much deeper wounds in herself where she could not become a ballet dancer. The effervescent Tia in Kapoor Sons, affectionately called Ti, dealt with her own grief of losing her parents. It is only befitting that the successor of Ri, played by Kareena Kapoor, is Ti, played by Alia Bhatt, who has been popularly called the new Kareena Kapoor. The lovable granny in Ek Main Aur Ekk Tu and the equally lovable Dadu in Kapoor Sons have the same traits. Both the films had a Kuch Kuch Hota Hai reference at some point, and like Karan Johar's second film, it's-all-about-loving-your-parents Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham, Shakun Batra's second film incorporates a message on the same theme. His second film has not only gone big in-depth, character, and psyche but also big on emotions.
The shadow of death looms everywhere in the film, but in addition to death, the film underscores the characters' wish to leave a memory and their ability to hold onto those memories. Death is inevitable and reminds us of our mortality, but memories are immortal. Dadu does not want to be cremated after death, rather he wants to be buried, in a way leaving behind a place to visit him after his death. One of the most beautiful scenes in the film happens when Arjun and Tia are on a date in a graveyard, a place where the last remains and the last memories of people are buried. When Tia asks Arjun what he would like to be written on his tombstone, he says, "Aakhri baar likh raha hun, ho sake to kahaani yaad rakhna." He is writing the last time, so, if possible, try to remember his story. Tia is stunned at his perceptiveness that for a minute, she does not say anything. I had expected that he would say something funny like Phoebe in Friends said that hers would read buried alive, but Arjun says such a beautiful line, again hinting at memories after death. A writer continues to live in his works long after he is gone, and the fact that Rahul and Arjun are writers points to this theme of leaving a story and remembering them through that story. Tia, too, clearly remembers the last time she spoke to her parents, and she regrets that she could not say goodbye to her parents. All through these years, she has also held onto her heritage house and never sold it.
The film is infused with family photographs that are also a reminder of the memories. Dadu's dying wish is to have a picture clicked with his entire family. The family bonds with each other while singing Chand Si Mehbooba and looking over old photographs that help them discover the good times of the past. At one point, Harsh is looking at the pictures of his honeymoon and says that they were in Gulmarg, but Sunita corrects him that it was Sonmarg. He then remembers the time he had to placate Sunita. The first thing that Rahul and Arjun do when they go into their rooms is to look at their old things; Arjun is disappointed that his room is not kept the way he left it (like another Friends episode where all of Monica's stuff is destroyed in the rain, while Ross' is safe). In many scenes, Arjun clicks pictures from his cell phone. He clicks Rahul's picture when he is smoking; later, when he bangs the car, he poses to get his picture clicked as if that is a memory worth remembering. No surprise that Arjun's friend is a photographer. Later, Rahul looks at the pictures on the wall of the house. In a later scene, Arjun also looks at Tia's house, which is full of pictures of her parents. After Harsh's death, a life-size cutout takes his place in the family picture, quite symbolic that he might have gone, but his presence in their life is eternal, and his cutout picture epitomizes this presence. Another touching scene in the film is where Sunita caresses Harsh's pillow and his clothes after his death. Whether it is a pack of sweet cigarettes of Tia, a bunch of Barely Legal adult magazines of Arjun, or the number of times that Dadu remembers he has watched Ram Teri Ganga Maili, these people hold on to every memory of theirs. Un yaadon ko main sau crore ke liye bhi na bechu. Nostalgia is a significant part of their lives, and nostalgia makes them feel young and old at the same time. As the ever-so-wonderful Haruki Murakami writes, "People's memories are maybe the fuel they burn to stay alive. Whether those memories have any actual importance or not, it doesn't matter as far as the maintenance of life is concerned. They're all just fuel." Likewise, the memories they carry are an important part of these people's lives.
At one point, Rahul says that everyone is scared of something or the other. Tia says she is scared of flying, while Rahul says he is scared of rats. Later, we find out the reason why she felt scared because she lost her parents in an air crash, and she did not even have the chance to say one last goodbye to them. She is still afraid of flying because of the traumatic experience that left a scar on her. But we also get an idea as to why Rahul is scared of rats. He carries a deep secret within himself, and he is trying to hide that secret from his family. Since characters in the film have a disposition similar to those in an English film, Rahul's fear of rats could be surmised as the fear of someone 'ratting' him out of his secret.
A thesis can be written on the changing portrayal of homosexuality in a Dharma Productions film. Films, such as Kal Ho Naa Ho and Dostana depicted a stereotypical portrayal of alternate sexuality. Although it was a caricature with none of the real characters actually gay, the films have been landmarks because they helped bring the conversation of a taboo topic to the mainstream. I remember reading somewhere that the Kanta Ben gag in Kal Ho Naa Ho helped many gay men explain the truth about themselves to their parents. In Student of the Year, the school dean was gay, but more than the dean, there were evident homoerotic tones in the two lead characters, Rohan and Abhimanyu. In other films of Dharma Productions, such as Humpty Sharma Ki Dulhania and Shaandaar, there were again references to homosexuality, particularly, in the latter, where the coming out of a character was almost a non-event because everyone in his family already knew about his sexuality. However, Kapoor Sons portrays homosexuality in a beautiful way; there are no caricatures, and there are no stereotypes. It is befitting that Rahul—the lead character and the poster lover boy of many a staple romantic movie, from Kuch Kuch Hota Hai to Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham—plays another role of a lover boy, but this time, he is in a relationship with another man. If Rahul can romance all the ladies, it is only natural that Rahul can love a man. None of the three reigning Khans, who can make the entire film industry dance to their tunes, or, for that matter, any mainstream actor, has done a role of a homosexual, but as if it is some kind of poetic justice, that another reigning Khan, named Fawad, from a supposedly conservative country, does a role, such as this one, with such confidence and aplomb. The word Fawad means heart, and is also referred to as someone who keeps his love to himself yet loves enormously. As they say, things don't happen by accident, they happen for a reason. Destiny loves to play its games.
There was something about the inherent loneliness of Rahul that made me care for him. It is not that he did not try to tell the truth about himself to his family. Earlier, when he came from London, he told his mother to come and visit him so that she could see with whom he stayed. Main kis tarah rehta hun, more importantly, kis ke saath rehta hun. It was his first hint to tell his mother, but she immediately pesters him for grandchildren. He tells Arjun that he will take his place in one second because he cannot change something about himself. When he tries to say to Arjun while talking on their bed, Arjun is already asleep. Ek baat batau Arjun jo maine kisi ko nahi batai. His family members either don't hear or see what he is trying to convey. When he tells his mother, he says, "Aapko mere jhoot bolna ka gham hai, ya meri asliyat ka. Lekin jo main hun uske liye main kis tarah maafi maang lu. Main perfect label ke bachhe se thak gaya hun." When he finally tells Arjun about it, Arjun replies that he does not know what to say to him. He says his whole life is a lie, and he does not expect anyone in the house will understand him. He is burdened by the expectations of being the perfect son of his mother. Thak gaya hun main apne aap se bhaag ke, aap se bhaag ke, logon ke dar se. I just want you to love me for who I am. In a beautiful touch, even the book he has written is titled Freedom Fall, as he wants to break free and be who he is. His coming out was the first step he took toward his freedom, and it was profoundly moving. I wish I could read his book to know if his writing reflects his claustrophobia. In the end, his mother accepts him and even asks him about his friend. I hope Rahul finds the happiness that he really deserves. Fawad brings abundant grace to Rahul, and of course, a little bit of a sweet Urdu accent always helps. I am now firmly in the I-Heart-Fawad Khan camp. Like the famous brother-sister Surf Excel ad of Daag Acche Hain, Rahul made me very protective of him, and I will fight for him. Millions of people struggle to come to terms with their sexuality, and I hope this will give some courage to people because, in the end, #LoveWins.
On the other hand, Arjun is the brother who always felt he was not good. He was never the favorite child of his parents. He also wants to be a writer like his elder brother, but he is unsure if he can be one. He wants to be a full-time author but is now a part-time bartender. He does not have enough money to book a ticket to India. He calls himself the second-best and the runner-up. He came to terms with that; perhaps, something was missing in him. He never completed anything in life and moved from one thing to another. When he comes back from New Jersey, the things in his room are not the same, while Rahul's room is maintained like before. When he leaves shoe marks on the floor, his mother asks if he made the mess, as if he is the cause of everything being messy. His favorite dishes are not made. Even the airlines lose his baggage. Arjun thinks he is an underachiever and is diffident. In this way, Arjun was very much like Rahul from Ek Main Aur Ekk Tu. Rahul felt like a loser and a failure. He thinks that life's problems are dumped onto him. When he breaks off with his girlfriend, he thinks that the problem might be with himself. At one point in that film, Rianna tells Rahul that he is perfectly average and should feel good about it. Some characters have stayed with me over the years, such as Rahul from Ek Main Aur Ekk Tu and Sid and Deepa from Dil Chahta Hai. Rahul from Ek Main Aur Ekk Tu is one of the characters that I have seen closest to myself on the screen. Likewise, I saw a bit of myself in both Rahul and Arjun from Kapoor Sons. The wish to be a writer, the burden of expectations, the feeling of being a loser, the lack of self-confidence. And, yes, Arjun writes bakvaas Bollywood blogs, so that is one more common thing. I bawled like a baby in the last fifteen minutes because sometimes, insecurities of your own life take over you. I am sure both Rahul and Arjun will stay with me for years to come.
There is a lovely scene in the film where one of the pipes in the family's washroom starts leaking. A plumber is called to fix the leaking pipes and put M-Seal. The family constantly fights among themselves in the scene, and the characters rush to the bathroom to help the plumber fix it. The leak was so much about the family itself, with a bucket full of secrets now starting to overflow. They brushed away the leak for too long, but it has now reached a tipping point, and the family needs to deal with it. They are all looking for a means to closure. The father has to end the burden of the loan but also find a way to end his secret extramarital affair. The mother has to deal with the closure of a secret that can threaten the relationship between her sons and also find a way to move on to pursue a catering business rather than constantly bickering every day with her husband. The elder brother is looking for a way to 'fix' the ending of his book by fixing the plot points, but he has also found a way to let his family gain acceptance of another secret about himself. The younger brother says he has not completed anything in his life, not even his graduation, and he, too, has to find an ending for his book to prove himself and make big, but he also has to deal with the fractious relationship with his brother, and his parents. After a happy night, Sunita and Harsh talk about being happy again. Everyone wants a happy ending, says Rahul. Vahi khushi kahaaniyon me talaash karte hain. There is no guarantee of a happy ending in real life, says Arjun. But to reach any end, there has to be some closure, which can be reached through acceptance and redemption. In The Kite Runner, Khaled Hosseini writes, "There is a way to be good again." The Kapoors have taken steps toward redemption and will slowly find a way to be good again.

Writing on Kapoor & Sons without using the word dysfunctional is hard. Like it was hard to find a review of Finding Fanny without the word quirky. Dysfunctional families have been present in India since time immemorial. Even the most remarkable story ever told—The Mahabharata—is based on a dysfunctional family with feuding brothers. The mother, Kunti, had different levels of affection for her two sons, Karan and Arjun. In Kapoor & Sons, there is another pair of Karan and Arjun, with parents showing different levels of affection for one son over the other. Such families were always there; perhaps, it is just the frequency of such films has been much higher recently. More than last year's family drama Dil Dhadakne Do, Kapoor & Sons reminded me of Piku. The constant bickering, the scatological jokes, the larger message, and even some scenes are reminiscent of Piku a lot. At one point during the end, Rana tells Piku, "I am not saying tum galat ho. Maybe this is the way forward. Isi ko log development bolte hain. Par apni roots unko agar ukhad do, toh kya bachega." The roots is not only referring to the ancestral house but also our parents and grandparents. We can leave them and put them in old age homes, but Piku chose to stay with her father and did not abandon him. As Piku also says, if there was somebody else in her position, she would have done the same because we cannot judge parents. In Kapoor & Sons, during the ending moments, Dadu calls Rahul and Arjun and says that everyone makes mistakes. Whatever happens, one cannot abandon the family, like Piku's message. In an earlier moment in Piku, Rana helps 'fix' the water pump with Piku sitting next to him and Budon giving them updates, "Dheere dheere aa raha hai," filled with metaphors. In Kapoor & Sons, the scene with the plumber, who is there to repair the leaking pipes, is also filled with metaphors. Sometimes, an outsider helps us provide a perspective.
Needless to say, the performances are excellent. Rajat Kapoor and Ratna Pathak Shah are excellent in their roles. Rishi Kapoor is also good, though his make-up felt slightly out of place. (Is it some coincidence that two lead characters are actually Kapoor in real life?) Alia Bhatt is genuinely a pleasure to watch on screen. Sidharth Malhotra is competent and charming. Fawad Khan was the performance that worked the best for me. My favorite scenes were the ones between Arjun and Rahul, where they share a certain camaraderie and candor, like the way Rahul nudges his leg on Arjun's head or the way Arjun makes fun of Rahul's driving skills.
I enjoyed Kar Gayi Chull; it is such a catchy song. I laughed out loud at some subtitles. Anu Malik became Justin Bieber, Byomkesh became Sherlock, and Karan Arjun became Beavis Butt-head. But the best thing was the story itself, where each character got enough space to leave a mark, whether Boobly or the plumber. Much has been written on the reason for choosing Coonoor, but I never felt it was out of the place for a Punjabi family, given that Harsh worked in a bank, it is pretty common for bank officials to get transferred; perhaps, they made it their home. Or, perhaps, it has something to do with Dadu's Army background. I could not get the reason for 1921, though, considering Dadu is 90 years old, so he should have been born around 1926, but I am sure I might have missed something while watching it. I was curious how Arjun could work in the US as a bartender without a full-time job. As far as I know, unless you are a citizen, you cannot work part-time unless he was working illegally. 
The film's final confrontational scene happens in the rain as if all the past sins of everybody were washed in that cathartic rain. All their secrets came out together in the manic downpour bringing a certain breathlessness with it. In the end, the photograph is taken in bright sunshine, as there is some atonement of the past and there is some hope for the future. As Saathi Re's lyrics say "Phir wohi barsaat hogi, aur ashq saare dhul se jaayenge, roshni din raat hogi, aur sab jharokhe khul se jaayenge." The rainfall will happen again, and all the tears will disappear. Light will be there all day and night, and all the windows will be open. 

Like any Dharma film, the film opens with a tribute to Karan Johar's father, saying, "We miss you." In the film, Dadu is in love with Mandakini from Ram Teri Ganga Maili, a film made by Rishi Kapoor's own father, as if that was another meta-Kapoor Sons. The film's message delivered by Dadu to his grandsons is that everyone makes mistakes, but that does not mean that we abandon the people in our family. It means being there for them in both their high and low moments. We must accept their flaws because we cannot change our family, no matter how much we try. Blood is thicker than water. Like Wasim is always there for his brother Boobly to support him in his bodybuilding competition, however silly it might look. Like Arjun learned the actual value of family after his father's death. Like Tia regrets saying those harsh words to her parents. Dead people receive more flowers than the living ones because regret is stronger than gratitude. As the beautiful title of Arjun's book says, We All Live In A Cloud. Sometimes, this cloud is dark, giving away to a downpour; sometimes, this cloud is white like a cotton ball in the glorious sun, and occasionally, it will be both when there is the rain and the sun together, giving us a gorgeous rainbow with colors, much like the bittersweet shades of life itself.

Other Reading: 
1. On Ek Main Aur Ekk Tu (link)
2. On Piku (link)

Dialogue of the Day:-
"Aakhri baar likh raha hun, ho sake to kahaani yaad rakhna."
—Arjun, Kapoor Sons (Since 1921)

Saturday, March 19, 2016

Paheli—Of Ghost And God

Amol Palekar's Paheli is a gorgeous film. It is based on a short story called Duvidha written by Vijayadan Detha. It has also been made into a film earlier by Mani Kaul. It is a story set in the deserts of Rajasthan. Lachchi (Rani Mukerji) gets married to Kisanlal (Shah Rukh Khan). Kisanlal is mousy and is afraid to speak his mind in front of his domineering father. On the first night after his wedding, Kisanlal does not consummate the marriage and tells Lachchi that he is leaving for pardes for five years. Lachchi, who had been looking forward to a blissful married life, is heartbroken when she learns this. However, after he leaves, a ghost who had been mesmerized by Lachchi's beauty comes back, taking the appearance of Kisanlal. Everyone thinks that Kisanlal has come back, but in reality, it is only a ghost. The ghost does not lie and tells Lachchi that he is not her husband but a ghost who has only taken the form of her husband, and she can ask him to leave if she does not want him to stay in her life. The film's title apparently reflects this paheli, though the word duvidha is more befitting as it means dilemma, while the word paheli means a riddle. Lachchi does not take much time to resolve this duvidha, and she readily accepts the ghost because, in her life, no one ever asked her wish, and here is a ghost who will only stay if she wants him to be. The one who took marriage vows to stay with her for seven years did not stay with her even for seven days, so she chose the ghost. Lachchi and the ghost Kisanlal lead a happy life without thinking of the future. But, eventually, the future becomes present in a few years, and the real Kisanlal returns, leading to another paheli where Kisanlal's family members and the villagers have to find the real Kisanlal. A gadariya (Amitabh Bachchan) solves this paheli to identify Kisanlal, leading to some interesting turn of events.
There is a lot to love in Paheli. The women in the film support each other, while the men try to put other men down. Throughout the film, the women in Lachchi's family support her, be it her friends, her sister-in-law, or her mother-in-law. When they find out that a ghost had fathered her child, they do not disown or ridicule her as is generally seen in such stories. Instead, they console her by saying that if they could not identify their own son, how can they expect that she would know it is a ghost. In the beginning moments of the film, Lachchi's friends are teasing her about her first night after the wedding. They sing to her to not give in to her husband's advances, but she tells them, "Jagne ki raat ayi hai, dekha karati thi sapana, sapane ko akhir apana, kehne ki raat aayi hai." She had dreamed of this night since long, and now, her dream is becoming a reality. That a bride, who is traditionally portrayed as demure and coy, is not shy to celebrate the upcoming consummating of her marriage is something that even films set in the modern era are hesitant to portray. The women want to enjoy life like Lachchi wants to eat a bunch of ber, while the men try to suppress their desires and run away. It is Lachchi who tells her husband to take her veil off on the wedding night, and she is the one who wants Kisanlal to make love to her, while he runs away, saying that it is not a good idea to ignite the passion for a single night. Kisanlal goes away the next day, unable to say no to his father. Likewise, Kisanlal's father's brother runs away when he loses a camel race, while his wife carries on with her life with strength, indeed, much more than her husband. The women even portray their anger in their own ways when the men do things they don't like, like Lachchi expresses her unhappiness by banging the plate when the ghost helps their family win a race through some tricks. In 2010, a gem of a film called Mirch was released and then forgotten. The screenplay involved three short stories, each set in ancient, medieval, and modern times. One story was based on a queen, played by Konkona Sen Sharma, who is married to a much older king, played by Prem Chopra. To get her sexual desires fulfilled, the queen dupes the king in a ridiculously hilarious fashion and makes love to another man in front of her husband. The other stories in Mirch had similar sexual themes of female desire. Sometimes, it makes me feel that over the years if our films have become more conservative. Stories set in ancient times were more liberal in their portrayal than those specified in today's time. Notably, another Rani film and one of my favorite films, Aiyyaa, talked about female desire and the female gaze. Likewise, Paheli, too, is an essential film in this regard that treats its women much ahead of time. 
At one point in the film, when the ghost and Lachchi make love, it rains heavily, and then a glorious rainbow appears. It is as if the parched desires of Lachchi have been fulfilled. Was the rain only in Lachchi's mind because Kisanlal's uncle wonders why was there such a noise, and the ghost replies that it was rain? The uncle wonders whether it rained in the desert or was it the effect of hallucinations of chillum. In one or two more such instances, the film makes us wonder if there is some paheli we need to figure out on our own. 
At another point in the film, Kisanlal asks the ghost about his real identity. The ghost replies, "Aurat ke dil me jo preet hove, vo hu main." He is the yearning that resides in a woman's heart. In the end, the ghost is trapped in the bag by the gadariya, but he manages to escape. In the original story Duvidha, the ghost is captured in the bag and is thrown away. The ghost is a metaphor for the woman's heart. In Duvidha, the woman goes back to her husband, and her wishes have been suppressed, but Paheli, changes that end and again makes the larger point of women having the ability to live with their desires. The ghost is an ideal 'man.' He respects Lachchi's wishes. He is madly in love with her. He never lies to her. He wants to help others. He helps build a well for the villagers (as Mohan Bhargava in Swades). He feels things and laughs uncontrollably when he is tickled. He wants a daughter and not a son. He thinks from his heart. He is absolutely perfect, but he is not human. On the other hand, Kisanlal thinks more from his mind and suppresses his desires. It is not that he does not love Lachchi, but he cannot express his love to her. He even thinks twice before writing a letter to her. There is a Freudian element to Kisanlal and the ghost. Kisanlal has the mind, and the ghost has a heart. In some ways, both of them complete each other. Hence, it is pretty interesting that they merge to become one person in the end. In Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi, Suri and Raj were the personas of Kisanlal and the ghost. Early in the film, Kisanlal's father tells Kisanlal that God is a businessman, like him. He keeps track of the breaths of living beings, the movement of the winds, and the count of stones on the earth. Kisanlal is always counted as a businessman; even on his wedding night, he remembers that he forgot to add the expenses of coconut. Later, the puppets tell us that even Gods have sinned in the past. Kisanlal is named after a God; thus, in the end, Kisanlal—the man—becomes a representation of God and the ghost. He acquires the characteristics of both of them and becomes a complete man. 
The one other thing that constantly came to mind while watching Paheli was that it is similar to a Sanjay Leela Bhansali film. Paheli was released in 2005, and till then, Sanjay Leela Bhansali had made four films—Khamoshi, Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam, Devdas, and Black. However, some of the scenes in Paheli are reminiscent of Bhansali's films after 2005. There are vivid colors, lovely mirror images, flowing fountains, sublime top shots, and beautiful peacocks everywhere in the background—all signature elements of a Bhansali film. However, the scale is not as grand as in a Bhansali film.
Mirrors
Peacocks
Fountains
Top Shots
The puppets were fabulous, as if giving action to the famous line from Anand, "Hum sab to rangmanch ki kathputliyan hain jiski dor us upar wale ke haathon main hai. Kab, kaun kahan uthega ye koi nahin jaanta." Instead of humans depicting stories through puppets, we see puppets showing through humans. Naseeruddin Shah and Ratna Pathak Shah voice the puppets and bring a context to the proceedings as the sutradhaars. At an earlier point, the puppets say that, generally, a ghost enters a man, but it is the first time, when an insaan has entered into a ghost, referring to that Lachchi has entered into the ghost's mind. Traditionally, a ghost is portrayed as a blood-sucking demon. Still, this ghost is not a vampire but a good Samaritan; more importantly, it has qualities even better than a human. The film never adheres to some of these clichés and veers away from the stereotypes.
Rani and Shah Rukh deliver terrific performances. Rani as Lachchi is lovely. There are so many close-up shots of Rani's eyes, and she conveys a lot through her kohl-lined eyes. Seeing any Rani film makes me realize how much I miss seeing her in films. Rani as Lachchi is another great feminist role in her envious filmography. Lachchi makes us ask questions about the meaning of marriage. Is your husband only a man with whom you take the seven vows, or is he a man with whom you share every detail of your life? Shah Rukh brings the contrast between Kisanlal and the ghost really well. There are apparent differences in the personalities of Kisanlal and the ghost, and Shah Rukh executes them excellently. It is one of the classic romantic roles that he is known for. Juhi Chawla as Gajrobai delivers such a terrific performance in a short role. It felt odd to see Juhi, who has been paired opposite Shah Rukh as a lead in many films, play a role quite elder to Shah Rukh. There is a lovely scene when she is breaking the cotton, and Lachchi comes and tells her to come to the temple, but she says how can she wish for someone to come back who has gone of his own volition. Juhi conveys the loneliness of a woman whose husband has run away beautifully. She also understands the pain of solitude when Lachchi's husband leaves her the next day and thus, forms a bond with them based on their shared loneliness. And, not to forget, Rajpal Yadav as Bhoja is terrific. He gets completely in the skin of the character. 
One of my favorite books, Cuckold by Kiran Nagarkar, is based on the story of Meerabai's husband Maharaj Kumar, who is jealous of her wife's love for the blue flutist Krishna. He wants his wife to love him and not Krishna. The dilemma is that if his wife's paramour was a mortal, he could kill him. If he was a devil, he could exorcise her of one, but how does he fight a God. "You can exorcise the devil, but how do you rid yourself of a God." At one point, Maharaj Kumar dresses up as the blue flutist Krishna hoping to get some love from his wife. He says, "To combat a God, one must become one, or at least masquerade as one." This is what happens in Paheli. The ghost masquerades as the husband, and then he becomes the husband by merging with him. And, the interesting thing is that the protagonists in both Cuckold, and Paheli, are a human, and supernatural being, and both of them are related to Krishna in some way. Perhaps, this is another paheli that we need to solve on the strange cosmic connections that never cease to amaze us. 

Dialogue of the Day:
"Dhan insaan ke ke liye hai, ya insaan dhan ke liye."
Maharaj, Paheli